首页> 外文OA文献 >The effect of timing of incentive payments on response rates for cohort study telephone interviews in primary care setting with cost-minimization analysis, a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

The effect of timing of incentive payments on response rates for cohort study telephone interviews in primary care setting with cost-minimization analysis, a randomized controlled trial

机译:通过成本最小化分析,随机对照试验,激励支付的时间对初级保健机构队列研究电话访谈的响应率的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: The effect of timing of incentive payments on the response rate of telephone surveys is unknown. This study examined whether up-front or delayed incentive payments were associated with higher response rates for participation in a telephone interview administered longitudinal cohort study amongst primary care patients with lower urinary tract symptoms, and to compare the costs between the two timing methods. METHODS: This study was conducted as part of a naturalistic observation study on the health-related quality of life and health outcomes of Chinese primary care patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. The incentive payment was in the form of a supermarket gift voucher to the value of HD$50 (US$6.50) and could be used in lieu of cash at a major supermarket chain.720 subjects with lower urinary tract symptoms were randomly assigned into two groups. One group was offered an incentive of supermarket cash voucher at time of recruitment ('up-front' payment). The other group was told that the voucher would be sent to them after the complete of their 1-year follow-up telephone interview ('delayed' payment). Primary outcomes were the baseline and 1-year follow-up telephone survey response rates. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in response rates at baseline (p-value = 0.938) or at the 1-year follow-up (p-value = 0.751) between groups. Cost per completed subject interviews for the up-front payment method was USD16.64, whilst cost for the delayed payment was USD 13.85. CONCLUSIONS: It appears the timing of incentive payments does not affect response rates for telephone interview surveys conducted on primary care patients in Hong Kong at baseline or at 1-year follow-up. Delayed incentive payments can reduce the overall cost per successful case. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02307929 Registered 28 August 2013.
机译:背景:奖励支付时间对电话调查响应率的影响尚不清楚。这项研究检查了在患有较低尿路症状的初级保健患者中,预先或延迟的奖励金与参加电话访谈进行的纵向队列研究的响应率是否相关,并比较了两种计时方法的成本。方法:本研究是对中国下尿路症状初级保健患者健康相关生活质量和健康结局进行自然观察研究的一部分。奖励金以超市礼品券的形式出现,价值50迪拉姆(合6.50美元),可用于代替大型连锁超市的现金。720名患有下尿路症状的受试者被随机分为两组。招募时向一组人提供了超市现金券的奖励(“预付款”)。另一组被告知,将在他们进行为期1年的后续电话采访(“延期”付款)后将凭证发送给他们。主要结果是基线和1年随访电话调查的回复率。结果:两组之间的基线(p值= 0.938)或1年随访(p值= 0.751)没有反应率的统计差异。对于预付款方式,每次完成主题访谈的费用为16.64美元,而延迟付款的费用为13.85美元。结论:奖励金支付的时间似乎并不影响基线或一年随访期间对香港初级保健患者进行的电话访谈调查的答复率。延迟的奖励金可以减少每个成功案例的总成本。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02307929注册于2013年8月28日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号